PlanetM3 Web Log, The "Correct" Opinions

Friday, December 28, 2012

Shoe Review: Merrell Tough Glove

  OK, so here is the long awaited shoe review.

Here's the deal...  Merrell Tough Glove shoes, a barefoot shoe, designed to let you walk "naturally" and protect your pretty feet from damage.  They have no arch support, wide toe box and zero raise from toe to heel, or zero drop from heel to toe depending on your perspective.  You can find more on the whole barefoot concept elsewhere on the Internet so I won't bore you with the details here.

I first learned of the barefoot concept from a friend who ran a marathon in the infamous Vibram Five-Fingers Shoes (the toe shoes).  He loved them but suffered a stress fracture after wearing them (with little break-in time) during the marathon.  Shortly after he told me the story, I read "Born to Run," a fabulous book about barefoot running, adventure, etc.

I did a lot of reading on the topic on the Internet and did some research on the different types of shoes.  I decided that I didn't want a barefoot running shoe, but a barefoot general-purpose shoe that I could wear to work with khakis and a button-down shirt or a pair of jeans.  It so happens that Merrell just introduced a line of casual barefoot shoes that are made of leather and fit what I had in mind.  I almost bought one of these shoes, but stumbled across the Merrell Tough Glove, a first-generation barefoot shoe that may have been designed as a barefoot hiking shoe.  It has a leather upper and the high-traction Vibram sole.  I thought it looked formal enough for khakis, yet casual enough for jeans.  Unfortunately, Merrell discontinued the shoe right when they introduced the new line of casual shoes.

Luckily, I was able to find some old-stock Tough Gloves from Zappos.com and ordered a pair.  The first big decision was size.  I checked all of my old shoes and learned that they range from 9.5US to 10US.  The one thing that was consistent among all of them was the EUR size, 43 in my case.  In the Merrells, the 43.5 EUR was the same as a 9.5 so that is what I ordered.

When I first got them and tried them on, the first thing I thought was, oh no, these are too big.  They felt loose in the toe, but after wearing them around, they fit nice in the heel area.  I remembered that barefoot shoes are supposed to have a wider toe box, thus the larger feel.  So I decided to keep this size.

For the first two days of wearing them, they felt awkward.  The lower heel almost makes it feel like your toes are higher than your heel.  My feet had weird aches each time I wore them.  After the first two days, however, they felt great.  They felt like slippers.  They felt better than my running shoes.

After I got over the size, I noticed that I felt pressure on my arch.  I have high arches.  I though, wait a minute, these shoes are supposed to provide no arch support, why can I feel them in my arch?  After some prodding and thought, I realized that the arch actually provides no support, but the sole wraps around the foot so much, that the arch part does touch the inside of the arch but provides no support.

I am on my feet all day at work.  These shoes have almost zero padding and zero support.  Despite this, they still feel great.  I have worn them both barefoot and with socks of varying thicknesses and they still feel great.  I have none of the pain that I would get from wearing my regular shoes all day.

I also enjoy playing soccer and freestyle juggling.  These shoes feel great with the soccer ball, better than most soccer boots.  You have tremendous touch and feel on the ball.  They are so light and thin that it is like being barefoot but better; your feet are protected from scuffs and scrapes.

The traction of the shoes is also fantastic.  I have been on slippery wet surfaces, hard tile and concrete, wet grass and mud, and through it all, I have never felt less than sure-footed.  I have also noticed that you have a much better feel of the ground in these shoes.  On rough and rocky surfaces, you can feel the rocks, but not so much that it is painful.  It really feels like you are more connected to the ground.

So these shoes are great.  On the downside, however...  The toe box area is larger than your normal shoe, great for letting your toes spread and grip, but bad when you catch the front edge of your shoe on the ground.  It doesn't happen that often (and maybe I'm just clumsy), but occasionally I can feel the larger front edge of the shoe catch briefly on the ground when I'm moving around in a less than normal way.

Second thing, is the leather is so thin and so lightweight, that I think it will scuff and wear too easily.  So far it hasn't really been that bad, but after a couple of months or so, I do have some light scuffs on the left toe area.  That is a minor inconvenience, however, and despite this, the shoes are still worth the high price you have to pay.

So if you are thinking about barefoot shoes or at least just want to try them out, this is the shoe for you.  It is a great introduction to barefoot shoes.  You can use them as your daily walking shoe to help build up the muscles needed for the barefoot life, and prevent those nasty stress fractures when you finally decide to run that marathon in a pair of Merrell barefoot running shoes.

Thursday, December 6, 2012

Shoe Review to Come!

I'm going to write a shoe review here soon.  I just got a new pair of Merrell Tough Glove shoes.  It's my first barefoot shoe experience.  I've been wearing them for a couple of weeks now.  Stay tuned!

Thursday, November 29, 2012

Squeeze Me

I was going to post a rant about squeeze bottles.

Ketchup and mustard, naturally.  Mayonaise?  Nice idea, I like it, but you sometimes still break out the butterknife to spread or get the last bit out of the bottle.

Relish? Please, what were you thinking?  Or so I thought until today.  Every squeeze relish bottle I've seen gives you a sopping wet serving of pickle juice followed by a bottle-busting fight for diced pickle goodness.

Today, however I used a new bottle of squeeze relish (I say used because I would not buy it on my own).  The relish came out in a smooth flow of a like consistency.  It was beautiful and I was stunned.

It did look slightly odd, a lighter green color, finer cut, but it came smoothly out of the bottle, sans mess.  And it tasted great too.

Bravo you masters of the squeeze at Claussen Pickles.

Saturday, November 24, 2012

Tis the Season!

Stopped by Hidden Valley today to pick up my passes.  It was snowing and they were making snow.  Snowboard season is on the way soon!

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Men in Black

Outrageous!  OK, time for a blog post and a soccer rant at that.

The other day I got a survey from NFHS, the high school sports overseer, collecting feedback on possible rule changes for high school soccer in 2013.

A couple of questions on the survey really irritated me.  It's no wonder why US Soccer Development Academy has banned its players from high school soccer.

First, let me start by noting that I am somewhat of a traditionalist.  I like traditions and don't like needless change.  Modern soccer is a sport steeped in tradition.  It has a long and rich history that has been protected and guarded for more than 100 years.

Now, the NFHS wants to come in and make ridiculous changes.  The first thing they want to do is "require referees to be in black and white striped shirts."  What?!  Soccer referees have historically been the men in black.  Since the late 1800's soccer referees have worn black, unless one of the teams wore a dark color, in which case the referee wore red.

In 1994, referees added yellow or white jerseys to the mix.  Never, though, has a soccer referee ever worn "black and white stripes."  That's football (or armball/throwball as it should be called)!  There are soccer teams that have been wearing black and white stripes longer than Americans have been playing soccer (Juventus, Newcastle).

Today, referees, as specified by FIFA and US Soccer, wear yellow or alternate uniforms in black, red, blue or green (depending on the jerseys of the teams).  Why mess with that?

The second thing NFHS had on the survey was a rule requiring three referees instead of one referee and two assistant referees.  What?  What does that even mean?  FIFA and US Soccer require at least a referee and two assistant referees (referee on the pitch and two AR's run the touch lines).  NFHS does this too, but also allows the use of the "dual officiating system," which is two referees on the pitch.

First, the dual system is a joke.  The AR's primary job is to signal when the ball leaves the pitch and to signal offside.  Without AR's, using the dual system, it's virtually impossible to make offside calls accurately.

And what do they mean by "three referees" instead of a referee and two AR's?  Are they implying that the two referees on the touch lines aren't referees and can't call fouls?  Well, they can.  So what is that supposed to mean?

NFHS and their affiliated state associations have already messed up the game enough.  Teams play more games than they should in a short span of time which leads to injury and burnout.  They keep time on the scoreboard, taking that away from the referee.  The list could go on.

NFHS should stop messing with the rules of the game and mucking everything up.  Just use US Soccer and FIFA's more than adequate rules.


Sunday, September 23, 2012

DSC02205

Monday, September 10, 2012

Getting closer

My wife and I went out looking at used Class A motor homes, we have found my idea of living in a Class A motor home to be possible. The prices of the used units are within our budget and come with everything needed to survive like a washer dryer, on board 30 gallon propane tank, 5500 watt generator that works off of the on board fuel tank. Some of the units have massive slide outs and some are more modest. We have come to the conclusion that we only really need one slide out at the living room area and that would be plenty for the two of us. We are looking to spend in the $20,000 range, I think that will last us five years. This adventure is going to be a five year tour, like Star Trek. Why five years? Our kids will be so busy establishing their lives in the five years following school they will never know we are gone, well that's my theory anyway. Between the ages of 19-20 to 20-25 they will be busy building their future and settling down. Buy the time they reach 25 they will be interested in seeing mom and dad again so buy then I hope to have seen all I want to see and be ready to settle back down myself. Along the way I want to for the first time ever to have one on one time with my wife, something we have never had. You see I graduated high school with my wife pregnant so it has never been just the two of us (we are taking our Pug). So in my travel of the eastern seaboard

I hope to reinvent my relationship with my wife in a way that till death do we part is the end we meet together.I also want to see this great country of ours that some many have died to secure, to not explore your own home is a travesty. So anyway forward I go, pretty soon Bud light in a bottle for everyone. RV Trade